On 6/26/06, Jack O'Quin <jack.oquin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> OK, I see it now. All those uninitialized write complaints are due to
> the fact that jack_request_t is a union. Most requests don't need (or
> want) to fill in all the bytes, just the ones that matter for that
> RequestType.
>
> There are jack_request_t structs used all over the place. The only
> solution I can think of that would make valgrind happy would be to
> initialize them all to zeroes before filling them in. While that would
> eliminate these complaints, I have some doubts that we really want
> to make all those changes. There is some risk of introducing real
> bugs while fixing them.
>
> Those valgrind warnings really *are* annoying, of course.
> --
> joq
>
Use valgrind's --gen-suppressions=yes option, create a suppressions
file, and post it to the list for all to enjoy.
Received on Thu Jul 6 00:15:01 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 06 2006 - 00:15:01 EEST