Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jul 12 2006 - 00:10:27 EEST

On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 17:06 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> Semaphores seem about perfect for this to me.. am I missing something?
> Why doesn't anyone ever recommend them?

i think mostly because in 2000-2001, they were very slow.
Received on Wed Jul 12 00:15:02 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stefan Westerfeld: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write"
Previous message: Dave Robillard: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write"
In reply to: Dave Robillard: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write"
Next in thread: Dave Robillard: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write"
Maybe reply: Dave Robillard: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write"
Maybe reply: jaromil: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write"
Maybe reply: jaromil: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write"
Maybe reply: jaromil: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write"
Maybe reply: Dave Robillard: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] realtimeness: pthread_cond_signal vs. pipe write"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 12 2006 - 00:15:02 EEST