On 7/23/06, lazzaro <lazzaro@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > Dave Robillard <drobilla@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> > OSC can go over TCP to avoid the packet loss issue (and messed up
> > ordering which can be extremely annoying as well). liblo's TCP
> > support
> > needs some work though.
>
>
> This comment illustrates an advantage for using RTP MIDI
> to send MIDI over lossy networks. The recovery journal in
> RTP MIDI supports graceful recovery from the loss of an arbitrary
> number of packets upon the receipt of the first packet after the
> loss (also works for reordering). Journalling is a feed-forward
> process,
> no retransmission is used -- thus, no head-of-line-blocking latency
> issues as one has when running media over TCP.
>
> See:
>
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~lazzaro/rtpmidi/index.html
>
> The IESG approved RTP MIDI in February, so the protocol is
> frozen. Hopefully the copy-edit phase will be done by autumn
> and then we'll have RFC numbers for RTP MIDI.
>
> ---
> John Lazzaro
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~lazzaro
> lazzaro [at] cs [dot] berkeley [dot] edu
> ---
Yay! i want my whole app to communicate between engine and gui via
midi! That's going to really be interesting... So what CC would i use
for add a new node named "node"? Sysex i guess? ....
Loki
Received on Sun Jul 23 08:15:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jul 23 2006 - 08:15:03 EEST