On 11/4/06, Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 18:37 +1100, Loki Davison wrote:
>
> > I actually meant vs a callback based system. Jack being callback based
> > makes it easier to understand in my mind. I didn't mention named
> > pipes, just the | <> signs. Even without the pipe section i think the
> > comment still stands. As a person new to all 3 i found jack by far the
> > easiest to understand and use.
> >
>
> You have used shell syntax as a glue between various audio applications?
> Hats off to you then, I would have thought to be unpossible, that gcc
> was a minimum requirement ... at least I am not getting anywhere without
> taking that route, opening an audio device using 'ioctl' ( ... which I
> copy/pasted from another app, not totally unlike how one would copy
> 'simple_jack_client' and fill in the blanks)
>
> > Loki
> --
>
>
cat thing.au > /dev/dsp works on some systems. I'm not saying it makes
total sense though.
Loki
Received on Sat Nov 4 08:15:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Nov 04 2006 - 08:15:02 EET