On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 23:52 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> (sorry for crossposting - have tried at LAU mailing list, but have not got
> any answer)
>
> Which kernel block i/o scheduler is most appropriate for JACK application?
> There are alternatives: Anticipatory I/O scheduler, Deadline I/O scheduler
> and CFQ I/O scheduler. I mean a kernel without RT-related patches.
>
Should make no difference whatsoever for JACK clients - if they're
written correctly, disk IO should not perturb them.
CFQ is generally the best choice all around.
Lee
Received on Sat Jan 6 00:15:03 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 06 2007 - 00:15:03 EET