Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] LAD/LAU/LAA/Consortium/...

From: Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jan 17 2007 - 14:22:13 EET

Marc-Olivier Barre wrote:

> On 1/17/07, Predrag Viceic <viceic@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> I didn't pretend that Linuxaudio.org suggest moving to forums. Read
>> my post.
>> *I* suggest moving to forums as *I* think it's better way to exchange
>> the info
>> than those 90-tish, Mailman powered, mailing lists where you can't even
>> search for posts or whatever.
>>
>> And apparently I'm not the only one that pretends that:
>>
>> Ardour has a forum: http://ardour.org/forum/15
>> Rosegarden has a forum: http://www.nabble.com/RoseGarden-f2887.html
>> Hydrogen has a forum : http://www.hydrogen-music.org/forum/
>> etc. etc. etc.
>>
>> WFT?! even glibc has a forum !!
>> http://www.nabble.com/Sourceware---glibc-f12198.html
>>
>> The idea I had in mind when talking about linux audio forums:
>> http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/
>
>
> Ardour is a bad example : most of the serious technical stuff is
> either discussed on IRC or in a bug report on the tracker (which leads
> to more tailking on IRC...)

More to the point: The forums are application-specific, not general in
nature. The LA* mail-lists are general, non-specific wrt applications
discussed.

I'm a member of a few forums that are successful, but I don't think a
forum is the best comm channel for general discussion of Linux audio
software use and development. IMO the mail lists function nicely now.

Best,

dp
Received on Wed Jan 17 16:15:01 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 17 2007 - 16:15:01 EET