On 9 May 2007, at 17:19, Dave Robillard wrote:
>
>> Optional support for fundament things is not a solution.
>
> None of the things you have mentioned have any /actual/ reason to
> go in
> LV2 itself, except the sample rate issue which does need to be figured
> out. I'm for making it a rational number or double; locking it as an
> int for no reason when there's any reason for something better at
> all is
> short-sighted.
>
> I do think I vaguely remember some reason why floating point sample
> rates aren't good though.... ?
Probably, but sometimes you just have to be realistic. I'm happy to
go with double sample rates if no one screams. I've had a quick look
at my code and it should be an easy transition - the most common
thing I do with the sample rate is cast it to a float or double and
store it somewhere anyway.
- Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed May 9 20:15:03 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 09 2007 - 20:15:03 EEST