Dave Robillard wrote:
>>> arguing for unnecessary inclusions is a waste of time.
>> Indeed it is. I'll argue for removals then. Neither run()
>> nor init() need the current parameters as they can be
>> provided by extensions.
[...]
>
> run is obviously needed to.... duh, run the plugin. It's in LADSPA,
fons hasn't said anything about removing run();
he just proposed to remove the argument(s) from run(), so no need for
getting extra sarcastic
mfga.dsr
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu May 10 16:15:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu May 10 2007 - 16:15:02 EEST