Re: [LAD] simulating analog audio devices part II

From: Stefano D'Angelo <zanga.mail@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Jun 07 2007 - 20:30:43 EEST

Il giorno gio, 07/06/2007 alle 12.05 +0200, Robin Gareus ha scritto:
>
> Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> > Il giorno gio, 07/06/2007 alle 09.20 +0200, Robin Gareus ha scritto:
> >> Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I read on spicy sound website: "However todays computing power allows to
> >>> do so almost in real-time!"... do you think you'll get it real-time?
> >> no, not any more.
> >>
> >> Without oversampling, small circuits run /almost/ in real-time. However
> >> the posted 3 seconds of guitar took almost 4 mins to be processed with
> >> ngSpice simulating at 1s/(64*48k) timesteps.
> >
> > 4 mins? OMG! :-\
>
> indeed - at least it scales linearly with decreasing timesteps ;) - for
> guitar a *8 or *16 oversampling is sufficient. ngSpice is clearly is not
> suitable to be used as audio-effect; yet it's handy to test&debug
> audio-circuits, or even create convolution samples.

Oh well, I didn't notice the 64! :-D
Anyway, keep it up. It's very interesting stuff!

Stefano

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jun 8 00:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 08 2007 - 00:15:02 EEST