Re: [LAD] LADSPA dilemma

From: Tim Goetze <tim@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Jun 16 2007 - 14:47:26 EEST

[Fons Adriaensen]
>On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 10:12:02PM -0400, Paul Coccoli wrote:
>
>> Is it an option to interpolate over a fixed interval regardless of
>> block size (meaning the nframes parameter to the run() call)? Or use
>> the minimum of some small number of samples and nframes.
>
>Yes, that is a good way to do it, and it's not much more
>complicated.

I agree it's a perfectly viable solution. However, I think that
subdivision of audio blocks to prevent the aforementioned long
parameter sweeps belongs into the host. It's true that for some
plugins it is necessary to subdivide. But for the majority of them
(at least those in CAPS) it's not.

My stance is that if you do it host-side, you only have to do it once.
This I hold to be an enormous advantage in itself, for all parties
involved.

Vriendelijk, Tim
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Jun 16 16:15:06 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jun 16 2007 - 16:15:06 EEST