On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 15:31 +0000, arisstotle.52613058@email-addr-hidden
wrote:
> I've been working with the 2.6 series kernel now for some time with satisfactory
> results ie (about 24 msec of latency and solid stability). I chose the 2.6
> series because its the latest, and I wouldn't have to patch as much to get
> support for my hardware (firewire alsa realtime etc...). But I've been reading
> more and more about how the 2.4 kernels can outperform 2.6 when patched properly,
> any truth to this?
no truth. its an old data point, no longer valid. that is, assuming we
are talking about RT-patched 2.6 vs. RT-patched 2.4. if you mean vanilla
2.6 vs. RT-patched 2.4, the latter is still better.
--p
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jul 20 20:15:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 20 2007 - 20:15:02 EEST