Re: [LAD] 2.4 vs 2.6

From: Thomas Vecchione <seablaede@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Jul 22 2007 - 06:43:35 EEST

On 7/21/07, . <_@email-addr-hidden-your.name> wrote:
>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > I've been working with the 2.6 series kernel now for some
> > time with satisfactory
>
> > when
> > you all say RT Patched you mean realtime module built, loaded configured
> and
> > used by jack correct?
>
> please learn how to quote. heres a screenshot:
> http://whats-your.name/i/bloglines_blows.png

Some email software does not put who posted every time, relax, it really
isn't that big of a deal.

realtime isnt a module, its a big kernel patch. my experience (not on ia32)
> is that it usually either 1) doesnt compile 2) doesnt boot 3) freezes up
> some time during the boot sequence 4) freezes up some time afterwards. i
> havent tried mingo since about 2.6.18 though so maybe theres been a night
> and day change..

I have been compiling kernels since the 2.4 series myself. All of the
2.6series, as the rt patch became availiable I compiled with it, and
have had
extremely good results. The only times any of the above happened was
because of my own stupidity, I have never had it not compile. Any time it
didn't boot was because of my own fault. Never had it freeze the boot
sequence, and any freezes I experienced afterwards(extremely few) I have
other suspects well in line before the patch.

         Seablade

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Jul 22 08:15:01 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jul 22 2007 - 08:15:02 EEST