Re: [LAD] 2.4 vs 2.6

From: Marc-Olivier Barre <mobarre@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Jul 22 2007 - 20:53:00 EEST

On 7/22/07, pete shorthose <zenadsl6252@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> even more confusingly, you may not need to patch your
> kernel at all for several reasons.
>
> 1. over time elements of the rt patches have been
> merged into the mainline kernel.
>
> 2. some distros feature prebuilt low latency kernels
>
> 3. some distros are dedicated to audio and are built from the
> ground up with respect to low latency issues.
>
> i'd advise those not familiar with the details to avoid building
> a kernel unless they've tried what's available in their own distro
> first, and found it lacking.

C'mon, they'd be missing all the fun :-)

__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jul 23 00:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 23 2007 - 00:15:02 EEST