Re: [LAD] FULL audio-signal path

From: Andrew Gaydenko <a@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jul 23 2007 - 01:52:04 EEST

======= On Monday 23 July 2007, Fons Adriaensen wrote: =======
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:29:19PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> > 2) there are some good theoretical arguments for needing more than 32bit
> > floating point resolution for a mixer
>
> Would you have some pointers to papers that discuss this matter in
> a scientific way ? I've seen enough reports describing the difference
> between floats and doubles in the same subjective terms used to sell
> speaker cables made of unobtainium and hand-woven by Yorkshire virgins,
> or equipment to revive old and tired electrons, but never anything that
> could be taken seriously.
>

Hi, Fons!

RME have decided to use on different operations much more bps rather
we (I mean, say, JACK server users) use. Have you a minute to comment?

http://www.rme-audio.com/english/techinfo/hdsp_tmhard.htm

Andrew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jul 23 04:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 23 2007 - 04:15:02 EEST