Re: [LAD] Golden Ears wanted

On Tuesday 07 August 2007 11:25:20 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:36:31AM +0300, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> > Why did you resample to 48 kHz instead of 96 kHz?
>
> Three reasons:
>
> - It's a very common case.
>
> - It's a considerably more difficult one than upsampling to 96 kHz.
> If you work out where the first aliased image ends up, then for
> 44->48 most of it is in the audible range, while for 44->96 all
> of it ends up above 22 kHz.
>
> - My web space is limited, and 96 kHz would double the files sizes !
>
> > I'd imagine the differences would show up better that way,
>
> Considering the second point above, it's quite the inverse.

Alright, thanks for the correction! :)

Juuso
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Aug 7 12:15:03 2007