Re: A common plugin repository (WAS:Re: [LAD] ladspa qa?)

From: N. Gey <ilfhi@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Sep 06 2007 - 12:27:04 EEST

Georg Holzmann schrieb:
> yep. maybe the gstreamer way is a possible solutions, or something
> similar. they have three categories: good, bad and ugly (which are
> also different packages):
>
> -------8<--------
> gst-plugins-good: a set of good-quality plug-ins under our preferred
> license, LGPL
> gst-plugins-ugly: a set of good-quality plug-ins that might pose
> distribution problems
> gst-plugins-bad: a set of plug-ins that need more quality
> --------8<--------
> (http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/modules/)

SVN is one (good) thing, but pre-packaging is very bad. Who will decide
whats good and whats not? There is no indipendent way for all styles of
music. Whats good for electro is bad for classical and so on. So
prefiltering is not the right way. Reviewing afterwards regarding to
cases of use is a more fair system.

Nils
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Sep 6 16:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 06 2007 - 16:15:02 EEST