Re: A common plugin repository (WAS:Re: [LAD] ladspa qa?)

2007/9/13, Krzysztof Foltman <wdev@email-addr-hidden>:
> Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>
> > I'd say package format (.rpm, .deb, etc), OS distribution (Ubuntu,
> > OpenSUSE, etc.), CPU architecture (ix86, x86_64, etc.)
>
> I guess one could think of adding the subarchitecture (as in: p3, p4)
> and optimization target too. The difference between subarchitecture and
> optimization target would be same as difference between -mcpu and -mtune
> gcc options.

Well... yes. But I don't know if it would work well with a regular
package manager (in terms of packaging work, updates, etc.).

Stefano
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Sep 13 20:15:03 2007