Re: [LAD] [OT] bash vs disk activity

From: Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Oct 10 2007 - 05:51:35 EEST

On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 09:16 -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 01:11:38PM +0200, Lars Luthman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 14:02 +0300, Sampo Savolainen wrote:
> > > Quoting Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey@email-addr-hidden>:
> > >
> > > > For example if I transfer 200mb to a usb disk the copy command takes
> > > > about 30 seconds before it returns and the data takes about 5 minutes
> > > > before it is actually finished being transferred and the device is
> > > > unmountable.
> > >
> > > quick-hack(tm)
> > >
> > > (cp -a /xxx /usb_device && sync) &
> > >
> > > But remember sync flushes _everything_.
> >
> > Slightly-slower-hack: add the 'sync' option to whatever script or config
> > file is used to mount the device (/etc/fstab, udev rules, KDE service
> > menu etc). That way all writes will be synchronised automatically.
>
> It sounds like this doesn't matter much for you, but keep in mind that -o sync
> doesn't cause reads to be unbuffered, so don't go trying to benchmark your flash
> devices that way!

Hmm, I need speed and accuracy.

-- 
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Oct 10 08:15:03 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 10 2007 - 08:15:03 EEST