Re: [LAD] "enhanced event port" LV2 extension proposal

From: Dave Robillard <drobilla@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Dec 01 2007 - 20:32:37 EET

On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 11:23 +0100, David Olofson wrote:
> On Friday 30 November 2007, Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> [...several points that I totally agree with...]
> > If you use integers, perhaps the timestamps should be stored as
> > delta values.
>
> That would seem to add complexity with little gain, though I haven't
> really thought hard about that...

It does have the significant advantage of eliminating the hard upper
bound on the range of time that can be present in a buffer (and with
'null' events, eliminates any such limit entirely, ala SMF). More
annoying to work with though..

-DR-

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Dec 2 00:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 02 2007 - 00:15:02 EET