Dave Robillard wrote:
> Though that's starting to sound like we're implementing a symbol
> system... probably going to be wanting one of those at some point
> regardless. Is that what this really is? (probably doesn't affect
> implementation much, just a hypothetical question).
Well, it's just atoms. Like in X, or Windows DDE.
> If it is just for URIs, we could maybe take advantage of prefixes and
> save some space in that table? lv2:Plugin is a lot nicer to deal with
> in all cases than http://lv2plug.in/ns/spec/lv2core#Plugin....
I'd prefer it to be kept general, but that's just me. After all, that
memory will not be used except during plugin load or reconfiguration.
Maybe it's that I can't imagine how would prefix-based mapping work
reliably (would every URI be first turned into prefix form, then stored
or looked up in the table?).
Krzysztof
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Dec 3 12:15:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 03 2007 - 12:15:02 EET