Re: [LAD] "enhanced event port" LV2 extension proposal

On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 23:20 +0100, Lars Luthman wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 11:58 -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 11:52 -0500, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 15:06 +0000, Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> > > > Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > > > Is this what we have for the event/buffer header, then?
> > > > > http://svn.drobilla.net/lad/lv2/extensions/events/lv2_events.h
> > > > >
> > > > char data? why not char data[0]?
> > >
> > > Not standard C AFAIK.
> >
> > n/m, char data[] is C99. Guess that works.
>
> Not valid in C++.

Ah, that was it. Back to char we go.

I was thinking maybe having it be char* would be convenient for events
where the actual data is in some pool somewhere (ie being able to reuse
this struct in that case would be handy), but I guess that could just be
another event type?

char* does cause confusion though, as this thread made painfully clear
earlier...

-DR-

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Dec 10 08:15:02 2007