Am Montag, 10. Dezember 2007 schrieb Rui Nuno Capela:
> this d-bus interface seems a good idea nevertheless,
DBUS seems to be very cool, yes.
> and now that kde4 is almost on the brink, it sounds logical to push it as
> duct tape for phonon and jack, eh?
No, never. See the endless discussions on kde-multimedia and lau.
KDE needs a multimedia-server/-framework [*]. jack is _not_ what kde needs
because jack does neither video nor decoding of compressed formats.
And I really don't understand how you want to duct phonon and jack by dbus: Do
you want to sent audio data via dbus? Is dbus even capable of these
data-rates?
Arnold
[*] And because relying on just one framework/server has proven to be a bad
thing, phonon is "just" an abstraction-layer between the apps wanting a
stable api and frontends supporting all the nifty things.
-- visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/ --- Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me to all your contacts. After a month or so log in as root and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your administrator to do so...
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 11 2007 - 00:15:02 EET