Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer)

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:14:05 -0500
Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 18:52 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:11:55 -0500
> > Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 02:24 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> > > Um. When the point being made is literally that most people think X, ad
> > > populum is obviously not a fallacy.
> >
> > unfortunately for me, you are quite right. but only about that.
> > now, as i stand by everything else i said, and as you neither dealt with it
> > nor conceded anything, we don't actually seem to be arguing about anything
> > at all any more.
>
> .... were we ever?

yeah. unless you think irc is a parallel universe.

cheers,
pete.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Feb 1 20:15:03 2008