Re: [LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3

On Feb 5, 2008 4:56 PM, Bob Ham <rah@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > If you want 'real' session management, you also want to save the jack-settings
> > per session.
>
> This was addressed elsewhere. The issue is the dynamicity of JACK.
> Rewriting LASH to use D-Bus because you don't want to fix JACK is
> lunacy.
That's precisely *NOT* the reason why me, and probably quite a few
others want to use <you_name_it> protocol to control jack.

From Fons :
> > That being said, I still do favor D-Bus over OSC.
> It's local only, no network support.
Right. Then again, all we need is a better control framework in
libjack and let people develop with whatever protocol they like, be it
OSC, D-Bus, a direct use of the API or smoke signals. I don't
understand why this disagreement goes on while a simple solution on
which everyone could agree has already been brought up.
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
MarcO'Chapeau.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:46:23 +0100