Re: [LAD] vectorization

On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 10:41 +0200, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:

> So in practice, if the results are very close together anyway, probably not
> even noticeable, I would definitely prefer to spend that time on other tasks
> and enjoy the fact that the implementation compiles with very good
> performance results on other architectures as well.
>

Then you will probably like this run of ./mixdown:

Benchmarking mixdown (WITH coeff):
pure C++ : 150 ms <-- pretty good, eh? ;-)
ASM SSE : 140 ms
GCC vector extensions : 150 ms

This is with -ftree-vectorize added to your compile options.

> CU
> Christian
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

-- 
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev