Re: [LAD] vectorization

On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 19:02 +0200, Mario Lang wrote:

> No. If you optimize code, you will only have to special case
> a few routines. The greater hunk of the code will stay the same on different
> variants. So you do not want to precompile binary packages for
> all sorts of special CPU types and feature, that would result in
> a huge amount of data.

Look here:

ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/Linux/distributions/Mandriva/official/current

Up to higher level directory
SRPMS 09/18/2007 12:00:00 AM
i586 04/10/2008 12:21:00 AM
x86_64 04/10/2008 12:21:00 AM

Here is at least two separate identical distributions of the Intel
"architecture", so it can be done and has happened.

Perhaps x86_64 will be fine-grained enough to define a pleasant platform
seen from an audio developers perspective? Which means death to sse,
long live sse3! :-D

IIRC the current celeron 540M should fit the definition for a low cost
alternative.
 
> I am still convinced that runtime detection is a much more sensible solution.
>

-- 
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev