Re: [LAD] FW: [piksel] The future of videojack ?

From: Stéphane Letz <letz@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed May 07 2008 - 12:00:50 EEST

Le 7 mai 08 à 10:47, Nedko Arnaudov a écrit :

> torbenh@email-addr-hidden writes:
>
>>>> /*
>>>> * Get the number of frames in a video port buffer
>>>> */
>>>> jack_nframes_t
>>>> jack_video_get_frame_count (void *port_buffer);
>>
>> i dont think there would be more than one frame per process callback.
>> so this call is not necessary in my opinion.
>
> I think with PAL (25Hz), you have one frame each 40ms. With interlaved
> video you get 20ms. With not low latency setup you will get more than
> one frame almost always.
>
> I dont get why there should be separate thread for video.

Because you may want to drop a video frame, but not an audio buffer..
i think 2 threads are needed.
But better postpone this discusssion for > jack 2.0...

Stephane

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed May 7 12:15:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 07 2008 - 12:15:03 EEST