2008/6/3 Dmitry Baikov <dsbaikov@email-addr-hidden>:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Nedko Arnaudov <nedko@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> "Stefano D'Angelo" <zanga.mail@email-addr-hidden> writes:
>>>>>>> #7. Global explicit initialization/finalization functions for more
>>>>>>> exotic platforms (they wouldn't harm, so why not having them).
>>>>>>
>> You need absatraction for defining global constructor/destructor in
>> shared library. As Larsl already said, you can use some C++ tricks (like
>> constructor of global object), for this. In my vision, such thing is
>> bound to creation of shared library file, this is why I mentioned
>> libtool.
>
> From my (big enough) experience, 'automagic' initialization of modules
> (and non-trivial variables) in addition to being not very portable
> is a REALLY BAD THING.
> And I would suggest using explicit calls wherever possible.
Could you please elaborate on that? What kind of problems can arise?
Stefano
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Jun 3 20:15:02 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 03 2008 - 20:15:02 EEST