Re: [LAD] Let's kill EPAMP???

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 18:34 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On 3 Jun 2008, at 12:53, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:

> >>>
> >>> If someone is going to write that helper library (or adjust SLV2 or
> >>> whatever), I guess we should find some reasonable conventions to
> >>> organize and use plugins in a chain-like thing. This is damn hard,
> >>> as
> >>> Paul Davis outlined already on this mailing list, and I actually
> >>> don't
> >>> know to which degree it should be done.
> >>
> >> It's not necessary, just intervene after each run() call, it's not
> >> hard and on a modern machine the cost is negligible.
> >
> > Sorry, I'm not understanding here. How would you do exactly?
>
> You don't have to make plugin A directly feed plugin B, you can have
> the host do some buffer twiddling inbetween.

this is still pretty hard steve.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jun 4 00:15:02 2008