Re: [LAD] LV2 dyanic manifest extension proposal

From: Steve Harris <steve@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jun 09 2008 - 12:11:25 EEST

On 9 Jun 2008, at 08:57, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>>> 2. I don't really understand how does the :binary property exactly
>>> works. I see the LV2 spec does not define it, but it is referenced
>>> inside manifest.ttl files as lv2:binary. Is that some kind of
>>> property
>>> belonging to some base class or...? And what if it is not present?
>>
>> It has to be present, otherwise there's no plugin.
>
> Uhm, lv2.ttl doesn't seem to say anything about that.

You're right, we never defined the lv2:binary predicate.

That should be fixed.

- Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jun 9 16:15:02 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 09 2008 - 16:15:02 EEST