On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 05:12:00PM -0400, Phil Frost wrote:
> Well, another way to do it is run balanced audio over one or more of
> the pairs in cat5. In fact 100 megabit ethernet uses only 2 of the 4
> available pairs, so you could in theory run stereo audio and ethernet
> over a single cable (though I haven't tried this, maybe crosstalk
> would add some audible noise). If your transmitters and receivers are
> properly balanced, I bet a blind listening test wouldn't reveal any
> difference. It's also cheap to implement, zero latency, and
> synchronization is at worst the maximum difference between wires
> divided by the speed of light. If you aren't sold on the idea, you can
> make a box with a tube in it, illuminated by an LED, and say it adds
> tube warmth or something.
Running audio over cat5 is possible, provided you use shielded
cable and perfect balancing at both ends. It's even available
commercially, see
http://www.etslan.com/pdf%20docs/12.%20PA200%20Series%20InstaSnake.pdf
Ciao,
-- FA Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica Parma, Italia O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte ! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Sat Aug 2 04:15:01 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 02 2008 - 04:15:01 EEST