Re: [LAD] Getting the most out of onboard HDA

On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 12:14 -0700, Justin Smith wrote:
> If you just did a simple phase inversion, you would lose half of the
> information you could be sending to the dac, you could easily use an
> algorithm that sets things up so you have full bit resolution (ie.
> double the rated resolution of a single channel).

So what it is the magic number then for improved resolution? At first I
thought intuitively: -3dB!

But now I am not so sure. I can't explain to an audiemce why -3 is a
better number than any other.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Sep 13 00:15:06 2008