Re: [LAD] jack_capture

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Kjetil S. Matheussen
<k.s.matheussen@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks to all. Those sounds like good arguments.
> I'm still a little bit reluctant against wavex
> though, because googling for the wavex format
> hardly gives any relevant hits.
>
> But I guess it's better than wav anyway, so
> I'm going to change something. Are you sure
> there's no other format that might be a
> better alternative than wavex?
>
> And I also wonder if wavex are able
> to handle >4GB files? (I couldn't find
> any spec about the format on the net)
> Because if wavex is not able to handle
> more than 4>GB files I have to enable
> the same workaround as for wav files.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>

you get a lot more useful hits on google with WAVE_FORMAT_EXTENSIBLE
than wavex it seems.

Loki
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Sep 18 04:15:03 2008