Re: [LAD] jack_capture

hi kjetil!

Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
>
> Thanks to all. Those sounds like good arguments.
> I'm still a little bit reluctant against wavex
> though, because googling for the wavex format
> hardly gives any relevant hits.
>
> But I guess it's better than wav anyway, so
> I'm going to change something. Are you sure
> there's no other format that might be a
> better alternative than wavex?
>
> And I also wonder if wavex are able
> to handle >4GB files? (I couldn't find
> any spec about the format on the net)
> Because if wavex is not able to handle
> more than 4>GB files I have to enable
> the same workaround as for wav files.

fwiw, steve harris used .w64 for his timemachine application. haven't
looked into it myself, but i recall someone over on the sursound mailing
list saying that it was quite sane.
maybe steve will chime in if he reads this...

best,

jörn

-- 
jörn nettingsmeier
home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/
http://spunk.dnsalias.org
phone://+49/201/491621
Kurt is up in Heaven now.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev