> You are urged to revisit this assumption. Every single one of those
> systems started from a similar premise as you are now claiming.
> Of course, if you just want to waste time programming instead of making
> cool sounds etc, go right ahead. Otherwise you will be at least 10x as
> productive using pd as you will in C++.
Paul,
Perhaps you were thrown off by my statement that "I want to build my own
system using linux audio native capabilities". And I sincerely apologise for
that!
I don't want to (or think I "can") build another pd/ChucK. I simply don't
have that
kind of intention.I assure you that the system I have in mind is not an
audio
programming language, although linux audio is an integral part of it.
------- -.-
1/f ))) --.
------- ...
http://www.algomantra.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Oct 25 04:15:03 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 25 2008 - 04:15:03 EEST