On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 10:08 -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Stéphane Letz <letz@grame.fr> wrote:
>
> > I think this kind of tools is a good candidate to be developed as an "in
> > server" JACK client. With the dbus based dynamic access of available "in
> > server" clients installed on a machine, it will be quite easy to load/unload
> > this kind of tool when needed (Netjack2 uses this model of "in server"
> > clients).
>
> Stephane has a good point.
>
> But, implementing it as an external client probably makes sense right
> now. It should be simpler to support both jackd and jackdmp servers
> with the same code that way.
agreed. and it may be easier to remain that way if users want easy
control over MMC ID and a few other parameters related to MMC handling.
however the appeal of using some "parameter setting protocol" to set
this in a client that is otherwise invisible is fairly apparent.
--p
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Nov 11 00:15:09 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 11 2008 - 00:15:09 EET