Re: [LAD] Jack MTC/MMC slaving

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Alex Montgomery
<apmontgomery@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> I think this kind of tools is a good candidate to be developed as an "in
>> server" JACK client. With the dbus based dynamic access of available "in
>> server" clients installed on a machine, it will be quite easy to load/unload
>> this kind of tool when needed (Netjack2 uses this model of "in server"
>> clients).
>
> Ok, so Nedko and I got a release out that supports goto/locate MMC messages
> and command-line parameters. We're going to switch it over to using JACK
> midi instead of ALSA midi next. Should we start thinking about making this
> an "in server" client now? Could someone familiar with this stuff comment on
> this?

I recommend making it a normal external client. That will be easier
to code and test, and easier to make work with both jack1 and jack2
servers.

-- 
 joq
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev