Re: [LAD] Jack MTC/MMC slaving

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Nov 25 2008 - 00:34:23 EET

On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 22:33 +0000, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:

>
> > Not relevant, because using Qtractor as the MMC source is silly :)
> >
>
> otoh, maybe silly because qtractor is also fully mmc and jack-transport
> aware. iow, qtractor and jackmmcctl will probably step on each other
> toes. hmmm...

no, silly because if QTractor wants to control JACK transport, its not
going to plan on doing it by sending MMC. thats all i mean. the things a
user wants to send MMC from to control JACK will be *outside* JACK, i am
fairly certain of that.

--p

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Nov 25 04:15:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 25 2008 - 04:15:03 EET