Re: [LAD] JACK for openSUSE 11.0 x86_64

From: <oc2pus@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Dec 16 2008 - 20:36:41 EET

Am Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008 schrieb torbenh@email-addr-hidden:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:31:22PM +0100, oc2pus@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 16. Dezember 2008 schrieb Thomas Kuther:
> > > @ oc2pus, jack in packman is broken, or YaST is. I set up a fresh
> > > install in a virtual machine using 11.1RC1 and only added packman.
> > >
> > > Currently there is:
> > > * pulseaudio-module-jack-0.9.12-8.5
> > > * libjack0-0.116.1-0.pm.1
> > >
> > > Now if I tick the box in YaST to install "jack" it pulls in
> > > libjackserver2-0 and jack, which of course breaks things, as it keeps
> > > libjack0. zypper on the other side gets it right. See the screenshot!
> > > http://gimpel.ath.cx/~tom/jack_weirdness.png
> >
> > nor the packman package or yast is broken...
>
> hmm... ok. it looks like libjack0-0.109.2 is not requiring
> jack-0.109.2.
>
> and jack-0.109.2 only requires libjack0.so
> which can be provided by libjack2 and libjack1.
>
> i consider this broken.

just for the records:
these are not packman packages.
the packman packages contains a X.pm.Y in the release tag, the actual version
is 0.116.1.

A lib-package normally doesn't contain a requirement to a program-package.

For my packages in the packman repository:
As a reaction of this thread, I uploaded new packages for jack and jack2.
They are now mutually exclusive and the user must change wich one to use.
Formerly jack2 was handled as a update to jack.I followed also the idea from
Torben to handle the jack-daemon like a library.

The "Requires" to the underlying library packages where already part of the
packman packages. So I hope the problems of upgrading/changing the
jack-versions are solved.

And a last note to Mr. Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
your posting in the linux-club community is very astonishing. You grab
sentences from Paul and others from here and put them in a very very special
context to fit your argumentation against SuSE distribution and especially
the packman repository.
http://www.linux-club.de/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=99521&p=605724#p605724
And words like "überhebliche Schwätzer" are very motivating.

have fun
oc2pus
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Dec 17 00:15:02 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 17 2008 - 00:15:02 EET