Re: [LAD] Dumb Idea #27: LV2 host as kernel?

From: Darren Landrum <darren.landrum@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Feb 21 2009 - 22:34:37 EET

Adrian Knoth wrote:
> A last remark: what you call a "kernel" could be ardour or qtractor one
> day. There's no use and no need in getting rid of the real OS, let the
> Linux kernel do the hardware handling for you, implement your LV2 host
> and do everything else in a LV2 plugin.

I was never suggesting that this *replace* the OS kernel. I was merely
using that as an analogy.

Otherwise, everything you say sounds really good. I do think in the end,
however, that Paul is right and that there is a good reason none of this
has happened yet.

-- Darren
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Feb 22 00:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 22 2009 - 00:15:01 EET