Re: [LAD] Dumb Idea #27: LV2 host as kernel?

Yes you are missing that, either we would have an intelligent host
commanding an unruly herd of time time-tracks, or we would just have a
single master pretty much in terms with its own inconsistencies.

In a fight between a single 24 track Studer and an array of synchronized
Nagra's, I know what combination of poison I would pick :-D

/j

On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 19:01 -0800, Justin Smith wrote:
> So there is our answer: one extra input on every "timeline" dependent
> plugin, telling it the logical transport time/state. That plus a gui
> with pretty pictures of waveforms or midi notes or automation lines
> gives us what we have been talking about, right? Or am I missing
> something?
>
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jens M Andreasen
> <jens.andreasen@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 18:51 -0800, Justin Smith wrote:
> >> Actually almost everything an audio plugin does is time dependent.
> >
> > But not to the wall clock!
> >
> > /j
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> > Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Feb 23 08:15:02 2009