On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Grammostola Rosea
<rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> But for packages which are valuable and do not pass the (license)
> criteria of Debian it could be good to have such a repository. For
> example for a realtime kernel and stuff like dssi-vst
dssi-vst has been plain GPL and perfectly suitable for Debian
repositories since version 0.5, released in December 2007, which was
the first release to use the vestige headers.
> (FST is a candidate for Debian imho)
Torben has clearly been doing a better job of marketing than I have,
if you knew that FST had become plain GPL but not that dssi-vst
already was.
Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Mar 16 20:15:01 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 16 2009 - 20:15:01 EET