Re: [LAD] jack_midi in jackd and jackdmp

From: Gabriel M. Beddingfield <gabriel@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Apr 03 2009 - 20:49:29 EEST

On Fri, April 3, 2009 10:38 am, hermann meyer wrote:
> I open 2 clients because I wont 2 treads and give one (the midi tread) a
> lower prio with pthread_setschedprio. I first try to open the treads
> from one client, but I cant figure out how to do, with 2 clients that
> work fine with jackd.
> I give the midi tread a lower prio, because at least it is a audio app,
> so midi is "just a gast". On low level CPU's this protect the DSP for
> xrun's when the CPU limit is reached.

Have you run in to problems with a single-client scheme? Was it giving
you xruns? IMHO, this is premature optimization. Doing two clients and
synchronizing threads is hard, error-prone work -- why not let JACK do
that work for you?

Besides, if your goal is to ignore MIDI input when the CPU load gets too
high, why not do something like:

    process(){
        if( ! too_busy_for_midi() ) {
            // process MIDI
        }

        // process AUDIO
    }

BTW, I see that your midi_process() is reading from a ringbuffer -- who is
*writing* to it?

> Isn't it common open 2 Clients ?

I don't think so.

-- 
               G a b r i e l   M   B e d d i n g f i e l d
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Apr 4 00:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 04 2009 - 00:15:02 EEST