Re: [LAD] jackd buffersize

From: Jens M Andreasen <jens.andreasen@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon May 11 2009 - 16:58:33 EEST

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 08:53 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:

> However, notice that far more important from a performance perspective
> is that power-of-2 buffer sizes permit buffers to be cache line
> aligned, which as far as we know (its never been carefully measured)
> greatly outweighs the kinds of concerns you are mentioning.

a cache aligned buffer of 96 would easily fit in the same space as one
of 128, only with lower latency.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon May 11 20:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 11 2009 - 20:15:02 EEST