Re: [LAD] jackd buffersize

From: Jussi Laako <jussi@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon May 11 2009 - 23:33:02 EEST

Jens M Andreasen wrote:
>> I did some testing on this in past when developing bunch on SSE
>> routines. The performance difference was around 2x.
>
> What was 2x and compared to what? Unaligned SSE or exact cacheline
> match?

Sorry for not being specific, in the test it was SSE unaligned vs
256-bit aligned. :)

For 96 float buffers it thus shouldn't be a problem. Something like 97
would be...

        - Jussi
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue May 12 00:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 12 2009 - 00:15:02 EEST