Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon May 18 2009 - 19:50:50 EEST

On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> Jack-dbus is not just an (optional) server using
> the C API and providing access to it via dbus.
>
> I don not know what exactly is happening but it
> interferes even if clients are just using the
> C API. And it breaks it.

as far as we can tell, this is true *only* for the auto-start
situation, and that is because of the substantive difference that i
outlined in a previous message about what "auto-start" means in two
different run-time environments. and it showed up for you, as best as
can be determined, because of packaging/build issues that we hope have
been fixed.

everyone involved (i think) agrees that the current way this has to
come to be (a dbus-specific version of libjack) is not the right
solution. we are discussing ways to fix this on #jack at present.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon May 18 20:15:11 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 18 2009 - 20:15:11 EEST