Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness : some comments

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:03:28AM +0300, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:

> Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> writes:
>
> > Well, the current implementation *does* intercept C API
> > calls in order to divert them to dbus, it's not just an
> > addition to the standard jackd. I never mentioned babies
> > being eaten.
>
> As long as interface is same at C API level everything is fine. dbus
> cant and does not intercept any C API calls. The implementation of the
> jack_client_open(), only when compiled in dbus model, only when wants to
> start jack server, starts the jack server by *CALLING* libdbus
> function. That C level libdbus API call is then implemented by using the
> dbus IPC mechanism (sockets) and then gets into jackdbus process that
> executes the call. Nobody is intercepting jack.h API C level calls.

Nedko, you continue to contradict yourself.

What you write above confirms that the jack_client_open()
call is intercepted and its action modified.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev