On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 21:03 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> Both are examples of braindead ways to do things,
> both originate from the same source. Dbus ties
> jackd to the desktop and is just one more example
> of the same insane evolution.
Indeed.
I might be way off base, but what is wrong with the old school approach
to changing daemons settings by getting it to re read a config file on
SIGUSR1?
Handle stdout by providing a couple of arguments that specify where
to write the output (Think named pipes setup by whatever control
interface cares).
Dbus & XML for what should be a minimal system daemon running with RT
priority? WTF?
I have some reasonably mission critical things going on with jackd, the
last thing I need on those boxes (one of which does not even have an X
server) is integration with the desktop.
Regards, Dan.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed May 20 04:15:06 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 20 2009 - 04:15:06 EEST