Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] jack2's dbus name

From: Florian Schirmer <florian.schirmer@email-addr-hidden-instruments.de>
Date: Fri Jun 19 2009 - 00:20:05 EEST

Hi,

On 18.06.2009, at 22:27, Jussi Laako wrote:

> No, generally data needs to be fed _to_ application immediately when
> it
> becomes available after A/D conversion (PCI DMA completion interrupt).
> Application(s) process the data and it is ought to go to D/A
> conversion
> on next hardware interrupt (PCI DMA reprogram interrupt), along with
> time-synchronous data from other applications. This creates total
> latency of inputhw+blocksize+outputhw. Generally input and output
> latencies should be around few tens of samples (due to delta-sigma
> converter resampling filters etc). And generally blocksize is also
> kept
> around 64 or so.
>

I think this is incorrect. The total latency should be inputhw
+2*blocksize+outputhw.

At timeoffset 0 the soundcard will start to capture samples. Until the
first sample makes it into the buffer there is a delay of inputhw (A/
D, transfer etc). You can't access the buffer until at least blocksize
samples have been captured. So the first buffer switch takes place at
timeoffset inputhw + blocksize.

Now you do your processing. No matter how fast you can do that you'll
have to wait until the next buffer switch will take place, which will
happen at timeoffset inputhw + blocksize + blocksize.

Transfer + D/A will add outputhw to the mix and you end out with the
first sample at your speakers at timeoffset inputhw + blocksize +
blocksize + outputhw.

Best,
    Florian

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jun 19 04:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 19 2009 - 04:15:02 EEST