On Fri, 19.06.09 08:45, Stéphane Letz (letz@email-addr-hidden) wrote:
> But why using a "timing" condition to know about "how much of this event
> dispacthing" is going to be done?
Because in the end it's a time deadline we need to fulfill.
> Would it make sense to just process up to a specified number of
> "waiting" events? So basically if events are waiting *now*, you process
> some of them, and the one coming between now and the end of the cycle
> would be processed next cycle.
Sure, but how do you define "some"? What is to define "some" based on
time, since that's what the deadline is about in the end.
Lennart
-- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Fri Jun 19 16:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 19 2009 - 16:15:03 EEST